Methodology

Every number on this site links here. Each one names the client, the date window, the sample size, and the instrument it was measured with.

We sell rankings and citations, and both are earned the same way: with sources that are attributable, dated, and specific. It would be strange to ask you to trust numbers we wouldn't expect a model to. If you find a figure on this site that doesn't resolve to an entry below, tell us and we'll take it down.

¹

Care Dale

Industry
D2C consumer health (shower filtration)
Window
April – July 2026 (13 weeks)
Sample
30 prompts at the April baseline, expanded to 38 high-intent prompts across 4 AI engines.
Measurement
Prompt-level visibility measured against live ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Grok responses. Clicks and impressions from the client's own Google Search Console property over the same window.
Attribution
Named with the client's consent, given on the record.

Every figure we quote from this engagement

#9 → #1Most-cited domainShare of AI citations in the category, April vs July
Google clicks & impressionsDaily average, April vs July
3.3% → 44.7%ChatGPT visibilityShare of ChatGPT's tracked prompts, April vs July. April was one unlinked mention.
30% → 76%AI prompt visibilityVisible on 9 of 30 tracked prompts in April
³

Nuyug

Industry
D2C fashion jewellery
Window
20 May – 14 Jul 2026 (8 weeks)
Sample
The brand's whole Google Search Console property: every query it surfaces for, not a selected keyword set.
Measurement
Impressions from the client's own Google Search Console property, read off the daily report on two named days: 20 May 2026, the baseline, and 14 Jul 2026, the latest day reported. Both are single days rather than averages, which is why the dates are published alongside the figures. The growth figure is those two readings divided, not a separately measured number.
Attribution
Named with the client's consent, given on the record.

Every figure we quote from this engagement

889 → 3.5KGoogle impressions/day889 → 3,529 on 20 May vs 14 Jul 2026
+297%Google impressions in 8 weeks889 → 3,529 impressions/day, the same two days

D2C innerwear brand

Industry
D2C apparel
Window
2-week engagement, Q1 2026 (2 weeks)
Sample
75 high-intent prompts. One piece of content published daily.
Measurement
Share of voice measured as the brand's share of total category mentions across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Grok responses to the tracked prompt set. Clicks from the client's Google Search Console property.
Attribution
Anonymised. This client has not cleared us to publish their name, so we don't. We will name them here if and when they do.

Every figure we quote from this engagement

#2Category share of voice9.6%, ahead of Zivame (8.9%), behind Jockey (10.4%)
Clicks200 → 400

What we don't claim

  • These are four engagements, not a cohort. They are not a promise of what your brand will see, and the sample is far too small to generalise from.
  • AI referral attribution depends on the engine passing a referrer. Some don't, so true AI-driven traffic is likely undercounted rather than over.
  • Answer engines are non-deterministic. Citation counts vary run to run; we sample on a fixed daily schedule to reduce that, not to eliminate it.
  • Organic impression and click lift correlates with the engagement window. We do not claim AEO work is the sole cause.